The five-rung maturity ladder
Median outcomes per posture (synthetic data, n = 3,000). Your assessed rung is highlighted. Climbing the ladder tracks lower cost, faster recovery, and higher mitigation effectiveness — all at once.
Median disruption cost by posture — and its spread
Bars span the middle 50% of events (P25–P75); the line marks the median. Cost is heavily right-skewed, so we lead with medians. Your posture is shown in blue.
Median recovery time
Days to recover. Reactive 11 → adaptive 4.
Median mitigation effectiveness
Self-rated 0–10. Reactive 2.19 → adaptive 7.60.
It is not just that mature firms face milder shocks
Median cost re-computed within each severity band. The ladder still falls reactive → adaptive in low, medium, and high bands. (The critical band is omitted — its cells are as small as n = 4 and the ordering is noisy.)
What this says about your organization
Data & method
Source: xpertsystems/mfg006-sample — 3,000 synthetic supply-chain disruption events (113 columns). License CC-BY-NC-4.0 (attribution required, non-commercial). Dataset: huggingface.co/datasets/xpertsystems/mfg006-sample. Credit: xpertsystems.
Posture is the resilience_posture_pre_event field (reactive → aware → compliant → proactive → adaptive). All headline figures are medians (cost is right-skewed: median $512,738 vs mean $1,912,836). Controlling for severity and disruption type, each rung up is associated with ≈ −20.5% cost (p = 3.1×10⁻¹⁷, adj R² = 0.42) and ≈ −5.8 fewer recovery days (p = 0.0015). This is observational, synthetic data — association, not proof of cause. Your six answers are mapped to the ladder by averaging; this tool is an illustrative locator, not a forecast of your outcomes.